Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Prev Vet Med ; 224: 106119, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38335830

RESUMEN

Biosecurity is an essential tool for rearing healthy animals. Biosecurity measures (BMs) are well known in poultry production, but it is difficult to assess actual implementation on farms. The aims of this qualitative study were (1) to provide an overview of biosecurity implementation according to poultry farmers in Europe; and (2) to better understand the reported reasons and potential obstacles for not implementing the measures. In seven European Union Member States, 192 farmers (118 under contract with a company and 68 independents) working in seven different categories of poultry production were interviewed on 62 BMs to determine the frequency of implementation and the reasons for non-implementation. Most of the replies (n = 7791) concerning BM implementation were reported by the farmers as "always" implemented (81%), statistically higher for breeders (87%) and layers (82%) and lower for independent farms versus farms under contract with a company (79.5% and 82.5%, respectively). Regardless the poultry production category, the most frequently implemented BMs declared by the farmers were daily surveillance of birds, rodent control and feed storage protection. Standard hygiene practices were also mentioned as high-implementation measures for most production categories, with some deficiencies, such as rendering tank disinfection after each collection and, for meat poultry, disinfection of the feed silo and bacterial control of house cleaning and disinfection between each cycle. The entry of vehicles and individuals onto poultry farms, especially during critical points of eggs collection for breeders and layers, as well as the presence of other animals, such as the "all in/all out" practice, particularly in layers and ducks, were also reported as the least commonly practiced measures. The main reasons for not implementing the measures (n = 1683 replies) were low awareness and poor knowledge of the expected benefits of biosecurity ("no known advantages" 14%, and "not useful" 12%), the lack of training ("not enough training" 5% and "advice" 7%), lack of time (19%), and financial aspects (17%). Despite the good overall biosecurity mentioned by the farmers, these findings highlight certain deficiencies, suggesting room for improvement and the need for targeted and tailored support of poultry farmers in Europe.


Asunto(s)
Agricultores , Aves de Corral , Animales , Humanos , Granjas , Bioaseguramiento , Crianza de Animales Domésticos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Europa (Continente)
2.
JMIR Public Health Surveill ; 9: e46898, 2023 Nov 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38015594

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the French population was estimated with a representative, repeated cross-sectional survey based on residual sera from routine blood testing. These data contained no information on infection or vaccination status, thus limiting the ability to detail changes observed in the immunity level of the population over time. OBJECTIVE: Our aim is to predict the infected or vaccinated status of individuals in the French serosurveillance survey based only on the results of serological assays. Reference data on longitudinal serological profiles of seronegative, infected, and vaccinated individuals from another French cohort were used to build the predictive model. METHODS: A model of individual vaccination or infection status with respect to SARS-CoV-2 obtained from a machine learning procedure was proposed based on 3 complementary serological assays. This model was applied to the French nationwide serosurveillance survey from March 2020 to March 2022 to estimate the proportions of the population that were negative, infected, vaccinated, or infected and vaccinated. RESULTS: From February 2021 to March 2022, the estimated percentage of infected and unvaccinated individuals in France increased from 7.5% to 16.8%. During this period, the estimated percentage increased from 3.6% to 45.2% for vaccinated and uninfected individuals and from 2.1% to 29.1% for vaccinated and infected individuals. The decrease in the seronegative population can be largely attributed to vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: Combining results from the serosurveillance survey with more complete data from another longitudinal cohort completes the information retrieved from serosurveillance while keeping its protocol simple and easy to implement.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Estudios Transversales , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Aprendizaje Automático , Vacunación
3.
Vet Microbiol ; 269: 109426, 2022 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35526479

RESUMEN

Enterococci are commensal intestinal bacteria and opportunistic pathogens in humans and animals. Enterococcus-associated diseases are an emerging health issue in poultry. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the occurrence of enterococci in poultry in France with regard to the manifested diseases and the affected avian species. Our analysis is based on veterinary laboratory data collected by the French poultry epidemiological surveillance network (RNOEA) that monitors avian diseases in France based on the voluntary participation of its veterinarian members. Since the creation of the network in 1989, 12, 177 Enterococcus cases have been reported by veterinary laboratories (Enterococcus cecorum 53.1% and Enterococcus faecalis 24.3%), with emergence starting in 2006, year in which Enterococcus represented 0.4% of all reported pathogens, and incidence growing to 12.9% in 2020. The main diseases associated with these reports were locomotor disorders 35.2% (mainly involving E. cecorum 77.9%), septicaemia 34.9% (involving E. cecorum 53.4% and E. faecalis 23.8%), and omphalitis 14.4% (mainly involving E. faecalis 59.5%). Most of these Enterococcus-associated diseases (71.5%) were reported in broilers (particularly affected by the locomotor disorders and septicaemia involving E. cecorum), accounting for 9.1% of all the diseases reported in this production sector, with an increase from 1.4% in 2006 to 17.2% in 2020. This study highlights the emergence of enterococcal diseases in poultry in France over the past 15 years and the need to maintain a surveillance system.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral , Sepsis , Animales , Pollos/microbiología , Enterococcus , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/epidemiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/veterinaria , Incidencia , Aves de Corral , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/epidemiología , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/microbiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sepsis/veterinaria
4.
Ann Biol Clin (Paris) ; 74(4): 449-56, 2016 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27492698

RESUMEN

Current high resolution HLA typing technologies produce ambiguous results, and it is often necessary to perform additionnal tests to resolve these ambiguities. Next generation sequencing is a promising technology, which can overcome this problem. It is going to usher a new strategy to determine HLA compatibility between donor and recipient. It can lead to non ambiguous results by analysing the full amplified sequence of HLA genes and by eliminating heterozygote phase ambiguities. Instead, as many new techniques, we can face several problems, such as analysis difficulties because of incomplete HLA sequences in the database or errors related to the sequencing instrumentation. Moreover, the clinical relevance of analysing non coding regions of HLA genes is not well understood, but raise questions about the interest of getting HLA full sequence to understand drugs side effects or pathogenesis of infectious or auto-immune diseases. Our objective in this article is to present a commercial workflow for HLA typing by NGS, on Ion Torrent PGM™ sequencer, and to focus attention about pitfalls encountered during the analysis.


Asunto(s)
Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento/instrumentación , Prueba de Histocompatibilidad/instrumentación , Prueba de Histocompatibilidad/métodos , Semiconductores , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN/instrumentación , Flujo de Trabajo , Errores Diagnósticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina/instrumentación , Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina/métodos , Francia , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento/métodos , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN/métodos
5.
Ann Biol Clin (Paris) ; 72(2): 178-84, 2014.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24736137

RESUMEN

The Luminex technology has become an important tool for HLA antibody screening and identification. This is the most sensitive technology to detect HLA antibodies for transplant patients and patients on awaiting list, and it has ushered a new strategy to determine HLA compatibility between donor and recipient. Moreover, the clinical relevance of all detected anti-HLA antibodies is not well understood, because this technique was shown to be prone to many artefacts or interferences, leading to a complicated interpretation for biologists and clinicians. Our objective in this article is to provide a careful consideration about this solid phase assay, and to focus attention on raised questions about technical performance and interpretation of the results. We should keep in mind that our results could change the clinical management of sensitized patients, their aptitude to receive a graft, and their follow-up.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos HLA/inmunología , Prueba de Histocompatibilidad/instrumentación , Prueba de Histocompatibilidad/métodos , Isoanticuerpos/sangre , Extracción en Fase Sólida , Transfusión de Sangre Autóloga , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Prueba de Histocompatibilidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Pruebas Serológicas/instrumentación , Pruebas Serológicas/métodos , Extracción en Fase Sólida/métodos
6.
Food Microbiol ; 28(5): 862-8, 2011 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21569927

RESUMEN

In order to estimate the prevalence of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella spp. on broiler chicken carcasses and the prevalence of Campylobacter spp. in caeca, 58 French slaughterhouses were investigated in 2008. Enumeration of Campylobacter spp. was also performed in order to study the relation between caeca and carcass contamination. A pool of 10 caeca and one carcass were collected from 425 different batches over a 12-month period in 2008. Salmonella was isolated on 32 carcasses leading to a prevalence of 7.5% ([5.0-10.0](95%CI)). The prevalence of Campylobacter was 77.2% ([73.2-81.2](95%CI)) in caeca and 87.5% ([84.4-90.7](95%CI)) on carcasses. No significant correlation was found between Campylobacter and Salmonella. Positive values of Campylobacter were normally distributed and the average level was 8.05 log(10) cfu/g ([7.94-8.16](95%CI)) in caeca and 2.39 cfu/g ([2.30-2.48](95%CI)) on carcasses. A positive correlation (r = 0.59) was found between the mean of Campylobacter in caeca and on carcasses (p < 0.001). Thus, carcasses from batches with Campylobacter-positive caeca had significantly (p < 0.001) higher numbers of Campylobacter per gram than batches with negative caeca. These results show that Campylobacter can be present in both matrices and reduction in caeca could be a possible way to reduce the amount of bacteria on carcasses. Of the 2504 identifications performed, 3 species of Campylobacter (Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter lari) were identified. The main species recovered were C. jejuni and C. coli, which were isolated in 55.3% and 44.5% of positive samples, respectively. These two species were equally represented in caeca but C. jejuni was the most frequently isolated on carcasses with 57.1% and 42.5% of positive carcasses for C. jejuni and C. coli, respectively. This study underlines that target a reduction of Campylobacter on final products requires a decrease of contamination in caeca.


Asunto(s)
Campylobacter/aislamiento & purificación , Ciego/microbiología , Contaminación de Alimentos/análisis , Carne/microbiología , Salmonella/aislamiento & purificación , Mataderos/estadística & datos numéricos , Animales , Campylobacter/genética , Pollos/microbiología , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Seguridad de Productos para el Consumidor , Contaminación de Alimentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Salmonella/genética
7.
Prev Vet Med ; 98(4): 271-8, 2011 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21176855

RESUMEN

The objective of this study was to identify potential risk factors for Listeria monocytogenes contamination in French poultry production. Eighty-four flocks of layer hens kept in cages and 142 broiler flocks were included in this study. For each production type, a questionnaire was submitted to farmers and fecal samples were taken to assess the L. monocytogenes status of the flocks during a single visit to the farm. Two logistic regression models (specific to each production) were used to assess the association between management practices and the risk of L. monocytogenes contamination of the flock. The prevalence of L. monocytogenes-positive flocks was 30.9% (95% CI: 21.0; 40.9) and 31.7% (95% CI: 24.0; 39.4) for cage-layers and broiler flocks, respectively. For layer flocks, the risk of L. monocytogenes contamination was increased when pets were present on the production site. When droppings were evacuated by conveyor belt with deep pit storage, the risk of L. monocytogenes contamination decreased significantly. Feed meal was found to be associated with a higher risk of L. monocytogenes contamination than feed crumb. For broiler flocks, the risk of L. monocytogenes contamination was increased when farmers did not respect the principle of two areas (clean and dirty) at the poultry house entrance. A first disinfection by thermal fogging and the absence of pest control of the poultry house before the arrival of the next flock was found to increase the risk of contamination. When litter was not protected during storage and when farm staff also took care of other broiler chicken houses, the risk of L. monocytogenes contamination increased significantly. In the case of the watering system, nipples with cups were found to decrease the risk of contamination.


Asunto(s)
Crianza de Animales Domésticos/métodos , Pollos , Listeriosis/veterinaria , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/epidemiología , Animales , Reservorios de Enfermedades/veterinaria , Femenino , Contaminación de Alimentos/prevención & control , Francia/epidemiología , Listeria monocytogenes , Listeriosis/epidemiología , Masculino , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/microbiología , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo
8.
Food Microbiol ; 27(8): 992-9, 2010 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20832676

RESUMEN

A study was conducted in 2008 to estimate the prevalence and identify the risk factors for Campylobacter spp. contamination of broiler carcasses during the slaughtering process. A pool of 10 caeca and one carcass were collected from 425 batches of broiler chickens slaughtered in 58 French slaughterhouses over a 12-month period. Potential risk factors were identified according to the Campylobacter contamination status of carcasses and processing variables identified from questionnaires. The statistical analysis took into account confounding factors that have already been associated with the presence of Campylobacter on carcasses such as the slaughter age of the chicken or seasonal variations. Campylobacter spp. were isolated from 77.2% of caeca (95% CI 73.2 to 81.2) and from 87.5% of carcasses (95% CI 84.4 to 90.7). A multiple logistic regression showed 4 parameters as significant risk factors (p < 0.05) for contamination: (I) batches were not the first to be slaughtered in the logistic schedule (OR = 3.5), (II) temperature in the evisceration room was higher than 15 °C (OR = 3.1), (III) dirty marks on carcasses after evisceration were visible (OR = 2.6) and (IV) previous thinning of the flocks, from which slaughtered batches came, had occurred at the farm (OR = 3.3). This last result highlighted the need for sanitary precautions to be taken when catching birds for transport. At the slaughterhouse, evisceration seemed to be the operation contributing most to the spread of contamination. Effective risk management solutions could include the systematic external rinsing of carcasses after evisceration and the implementation of slaughtering schedules according to the Campylobacter contamination status of flocks.


Asunto(s)
Mataderos/estadística & datos numéricos , Campylobacter/aislamiento & purificación , Pollos/microbiología , Contaminación de Alimentos/análisis , Industria de Procesamiento de Alimentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Animales , Campylobacter/crecimiento & desarrollo , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Seguridad de Productos para el Consumidor , Contaminación de Alimentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Carne/microbiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...